THE QUESTION OF USING ANTIDOTES IN BIO-ENERGY THERAPY by
V.A.Vinnikov
The article identifies how a SCENAR therapist should apply
the achievements of modern biological science and consider many ages experience
of practical homeopathy, using Gering Low, Theory of miasma by Ganeman etc.
It goe on to question the problem of antidote as an effective form the conducting
therapy, which can be solved only by mutual practical experience from many medical
doctors. The article outlines how Scenar does not always provide the fairytale
results which have made it famous and a favoured tool amoungst pratitioners.
Rather Vinnikov goes on to point out that the Scenar will not solve all the
problems presented to the practioner/doctor from the individual undergoing Scenar
therapy. However, Scenar can be used in conjunction with good medical, practitioner
experience to improve or normalise a condition. The Scenar protocol can and
often should encorporate nutrition, emotional healing or homeopathy to name
but a few complementary options. The article goes on to emphasize that the doctor/practitioner
should not simply use Scenar as an antidote to a condition but rather search
for the route causes which may have brought on the malady in the first place.
A prime example of this is using the Scenar to aliviate chest pain when all
along the subject smokes cigarettes.
The analysis of the conversational manner and behaviour of
a person, the character of his/her complaints, illusions and sensations replace
"high-technological", but sometimes absolutely non-sensual methods
of laboratory diagnostics. Amidst this "modern" tinsel, as grass between
stone plates, preserve their viability and effectiveness so-called alternative
methods of therapy.
And what is interesting? Both, rather simple methods (toughening
up according to P.Ivanov, breathing gymnastics according to Byteiko, etc.) and
complicate types of therapy ("Psychological Trilogy") which are gaining
considerable spread around the world, at various degree use natural low "Similia
similibeis curentur" ("similar treats similar"), which was formulated
two thousands ago by great Hoppocrate. Following this universal low, have survived
and started blooming an amazing science HOMEOPATHY. By present time Homeopathy
presents impressive arsenal of remedies (over 1200), which are strictly individually
chosen for each patient. Also, many thousands of doctors of great experience
contributed own investment into medical practice.
SCENAR therapy with its wonderful, but not fully studied effects
of the action on the energetic status of the organism, works, apparently, within
the Low of Similarity, realising its potential on the own level. By this, apparently,
is explained the fact, that apart from SCENAR-fairy-tells results of the treatment,
each doctor who use this device face sometimes with failure. Moreover, the experience
shows, that a paradoxical tendency is existed: with establishing "SCENAR-experience"
there are some patients appeared which are "not going". That is why,
I deeply sure, that a SCENAR therapist should apply the achievements of modern
biological science and consider many ages experience of practical homeopathy,
using Gering Low, Theory of miasma by Ganeman etc. Another question is a problem
to antidote the effect of the conducting therapy, which can be solved only by
mutual practical experience from many medical doctors.
Thinking doctor-therapist will definitely come to a conclusion
that a choice of correct form of the therapy is just a first step in the long
chain of making decisions. The way to health often not as simple and "the
danger often is waiting behind the each corner" (J.Shore). The problem is
very important and the degree of thoroughness has not been reduced by any of existing
sections of medicine. However, lately there just rare articles are devoted to
this problem. "Stoppage" of the action of homeopathic remedies and effect
from SCENAR therapy - is one of "a danger", which being not recognised
could lead in the end to complete elimination of the achieved therapeutic effect.
The factors - hindrances (external influence) are those which
stop general "movement" of the organism towards the recovery. Before
their description, lets elaborate some points.
First of all, today there is no strict explanation exists
on the action of the homeopathic remedies on the human organism. Judging by
all, SCENAR theory has not the explanation either. SCENAR practitioners can
only "to conjecture" this process, formulating certain statements
and rules, which action later confirms or rejects by Its Majesty Experience.
Secondly, we should allow that the human organism at any state
is extra intelligent self-regulating system. Neither any process, nor any clinical
symptom is a mistaken result by a "mad action". Any change in the
condition - is a manifestation of immediate attempt of the organism to restore
internal balance and necessary equilibrium with environment. From these judgements
we can make a conclusion: the action of the treatment factor (homeopathic remedy,
SCENAR-action, acupuncture etc.) according to the Low of Similarity must realise
that " clever" system of Self-regulation become to act in the direction
of Regulation of Harmony of functioning the organs and systems. The criteria
of the "correct" course of treatment are the Gering Lows:
- the vector of cure spread from the "top to the bottom";
- the vector of cure spread from the "inside to the outside";
- The vector of cure spread from the "most important organs to least".
Finally, thirdly: any treatment intervention on the level,
"laying" more superficial the level of the pathological process influence
negative on the course of recovery!
The factors impeding to the treatment to the treatment
action of the therapeutic agents could be devided into two groups:
- direct influence (FDI)
- indirect influence (FII)
The first group includes stress actions or compounds, which
influence on vitality of the organism, provoking functional and organic disturbances.
Among them are: coffee, dental interventions, camphor, psychical stress and
some methods of treatment (this can be irrational application and some methods
of treatment (this can be also irrational usage of homeopathic remedies).
In the second group united those factors, which impede the
"regulation" of the process (J.Jhor) and cause its stoppage or even
return to the initial state.
The indirect influence factors distort or suppress the symptoms,
characteristic of the damage in the organs and the systems, which are engaged
by the organism for balancing with environment. Among them: medicines for the
skin pathology, drugs or procedures for the stoppage of discharge, various methods
of massage, osteopathy, etc.¹
I think the statement about the all forms of the "natural
treatment" automatically complement each other mistaken. This idea is able
to support only those who never observed soft and gradual action of "correct
mono-therapy". By administration without thinking the intermediate treatments
we can only interrupt recovery. This can be any type of therapy, including osteopathy,
chiropractic, acupuncture, api-therapy etc., which possess by expressive "destroying"
action, when untimely used.
We should mention about less known and, because of this, rarely
taking into account effect of "premature administration of homeopathic
remedy". Considering this phenomenon can be useful in practice of SCENAR
therapy.
¹ This is referred to the situation, when the conducted
therapy (homeopathic remedies of SCENAR device) provoke "movement"
of the organism towards the recovery. That is why it makes sense seriously consider
the expediency of the combination of various types of the treatment and the
effectiveness of the application the additional methods of treatment in order
the get quick result. Before to add additional type of therapy ask yourself:
- How deep and how long will last the expected result?
- Will other organs and systems of the organism suffer by compensating their
"vital force" towards the speeding up the treatment process?
This is referred to so called "homeopathic allopathy"
with its "masterpiece" like "Mischievous boy", "Rest"
and other which is spread lately. Non sensible usage of this remedies just increase
the course of disease. So, we can highlight two most common mistakes:
1 Inclination towards the frequent change of the medicines and ignoring the
effect, where a doctor do not understand completely all depth of the pathological
process, not capable (or does not try?) to see the signs of the beginning of
restoration of patient's health. He gets raised doubts, the "harry"
appears, unnecessary hustle and as a result - administration of a new remedy.
The trouble is that last one is close "by spectrum" to previous and
that is why has got bigger "destroying" effect on still fragile restorative
forces of the organism. Sometimes a doctor could not recognise some factors
of environment and patient's organism. Actually, it looks like the correct treatment
was administrated and the first indications of the beginning of the restoration
of health had occurred and suddenly the patient decided to have another intermediate
therapy (massive dose vitamins, Herbalife, hydro-massage, etc.) Do you remember
the usual phrase:" This won't harm me". But… the progress of
the recovery is stopping. A doctor has to start "negotiations" again,
chose another, new remedy (the clinical picture has changed!). Last remedy will
definitely have an effect, however, the final effect will be less, then from
the initial remedy!!
2. Inappropriate, unwise usage of homeopathic remedies (possibly
and SCENAR therapy) for the treatment of acute illness on the background of
received constitutional treatment of chronic pathology.
This kind of "intervention", which could even be
conducted after many months after the received correct therapy could turn the
process of recovery on 180 degree, "through far back" a healthy patient.
There is an axiom exists in homeopathy: more deep the initial
pathology, more chance for reverse of the course of disease, when not justified
"acute" therapy has been administrated. Each administration, each
session must be thoroughly checked through with a consideration of the above
mentioned principals.
In the matter of fact, acute illness - this is a "toughening up" of
the organism and an attempt of the organism to "move up one step higher"
into formation of the own stabile immunity. To add the correcting therapy only
necessary, when such "toughening up" is going above the limit, when
into the process of protection the vital organs is getting involved! So, before
"pressing" the acute pathology you should ask the following questions
yourself:
- Is this "splash" is a part of the general process of cure?
- Would the "acute" therapy be touching the structures laying more
superficially, then the main pathology? ²
- Would be an expected benefit from the immediate therapy prevailing over the
risk of the return of the initial pathology?
If the initial pathology was quite serious, especially when the pathology was
on the mental and emotional level of the organism, the risk of its return is
extremely high!
Never use a patient as a testing site for your theoretical
deduction. At the treatment of the acute pathology on the background of the
conducted constitutional therapy follow the criteria (V.Guegas):
a). If possible, wait for 2-3 days, before starting the treatment. Before the
treatment you can use casual remedies. At first days, it is difficult to choose
a remedy.
b). On next day clinical picture is becoming more clear, the condition is exacerbates,
as the organism is starting self-reconstruction in a full range.
c). On the third day - it is a high time for analysis:
- If the patient feels better, then a day before, there is no need in the treatment
- the organism can manage itself.
- If the patient feels worse, then a day before, the treatment has to be started.
By this moment clinical picture will become clearer.
- If the condition is tense, then the necessity of the treatment has to be defined
by the severity of the patient's condition.
The question raised in the article is very important, especially
for Homeopathy and SCENAR therapy. These two disciplines can be referred as
an ideal forms of treatment, as in their basis they use natural forces of self-healing.
Homeopathic remedies and SCENAR energetic action influence on the whole organism
of the patient, embracing as somatic medium and mental, emotional levels of
vital activity. If you conduct that "correct" therapy, we can say
that this patient will be cured. There is only needed a sensible choice for
therapy,
² I remember the case: a female patient E., 42, she followed her friend
advice "effectively" to take of pain in her back in a sauna, gaining
the result for one week. As she stopped her procedures, she felt general worsening
of her condition. She had to leave her work. Pains in the back disappeared,
but she started having weakness, cough, breathlessness and disturbed sleep.
By taking homeopathic remedies she restored her level of health, but pains in
her back returned, which, apparently, would disappear with time.
attentive and "thought through" treatment. If a
doctor limits him/herself by "small", trying to chase for "the
pathology", he/she will only belittle the meaning of these Methods, limiting
its capability by own incompetence. If a doctor will assess the results of his/her
work by average standard and if the final assessment of the condition of the
patient is uncertain, it is mean that this "expert" do not ask him/herself
the questions which necessary need answering:
- Why at this patient a considerable improvement took place, but general result
turned up to be equal to zero?
- Why, despite the correct choice of therapy, which seems to be very effective,
the patient is still ill?
- How and in which sections I will have to deepen my knowledge in the chosen
method of therapy?
Literature.
1. Jonathan Shove. Homeopathic antidotes - Editorial Comment.- Links, December
1990, vol.83, No4
2. Paolo Bellavit, Andrea Signorin. Homeopathy. A frontier in medical Science.
North Atlantic books, Berkeley, California, 1995, 035
3. George Vithoulkas. The science of homeopathy. Crove weidenfield, New-York,
1980, 332
4. Rasjan Sankaran. The Spirit of Homeopathy. Homeopathic medical Publishers,
Bombay, 1993, 329.
